Pages Menu
TwitterRssFacebook
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jun 6, 2016

Gerrymandering is bad for business in North Carolina

Over 100 CEOs of prominent corporations have urged North Carolina lawmakers to rethink the passage of House Bill 2, passed in a day to block Charlotte’s anti-discrimination ordinance. And nearly half of North Carolina voters want to repeal HB2, according to new survey results from Public Policy Polling.

But it’s unclear whether legislators will feel any motivation to listen.

The troubling reality is that 90 percent of lawmakers voting in favor of HB2 either face no competition in this fall’s election or are running in such heavily gerrymandered districts that they are virtually guaranteed victory.

Gerrymandering is largely the reason for the lack of competition in our elections and a chief culprit behind increased polarization in our state’s politics, undercutting the bipartisan cooperation that has made North Carolina great.

Over many decades, our state has been among the fastest-growing in the nation, with people from across the country and around the globe drawn to North Carolina as a place where innovation is embraced and businesses can thrive. We owe much of the prosperity here to moderate voices from a broad spectrum of political views, advanced by North Carolinians who have worked together to promote our state’s best interests.

Democrats and Republicans partnered on such forward-thinking projects as the Research Triangle Park. That bipartisan spirit has also been a driving force in Charlotte’s becoming a banking capital of the U.S. And the longtime investment in our world-class universities has made North Carolina home to the best and brightest talent in any career field.

However, that tradition of moderation and cooperation is jeopardized by gerrymandering, which has created an atmosphere where candidates have more incentive to speak to either the far left or far right than to seek a more centrist way.

“Compromise” should not be a dirty word in politics, but rather be a sign that principled people can find common ground on important issues. That’s why a growing number of civic leaders, along with a majority of voters across the state, support an independent process for redistricting in North Carolina.

Instead of politicians drawing their own voting maps, redistricting should be entrusted to a nonpartisan body that can ensure congressional and legislative districts reflect our state’s population. Fairly drawn districts can ensure that candidates have to speak to a broad range of citizens in order to win on Election Day and that voters have a chance to hold their elected officials accountable.

In turn, our state would have a reliably moderate political climate, giving businesses and residents confidence that we won’t see rash and radical swings of the political pendulum from one extreme to the other.

Thankfully, many Republicans and Democrats join us in supporting a better way to draw our voting maps. Both Gov. Pat McCrory and Attorney General Roy Cooper have called for an end to gerrymandering. And just last year, a bipartisan majority of N.C. House members co-sponsored a bill to establish independent redistricting.

With such strong bipartisan backing, we call on our state’s political leaders and legislative candidates running in 2016 to support redistricting reform and to do all in their power to establish a truly fair and independent process for drawing North Carolina’s voting maps.

It would make possible something we can’t do now: hold our elected officials accountable.

Read More

Posted by on Jun 1, 2016

Gerrymandering is costing NC taxpayers millions

A special congressional election brought about by the legislature’s unconstitutional gerrymandering of voting maps will cost North Carolina taxpayers millions of dollars and likely result in low voter turnout next week.

That was the message at a press conference organized by the nonpartisan Common Cause North Carolina inside the state legislature on Wednesday. The good-government group highlighted the estimated $9.5 million price tag for the June 7 special congressional election that is the direct result of state lawmakers’ gerrymandering.

In February, a panel of federal judges found that legislators had unlawfully gerrymandered North Carolina’s congressional voting maps along racial lines and ordered them to be redrawn, leading to a delayed primary vote and in some cases dramatic changes to the state’s congressional districts.

“Clearly, we must fully fund our elections. But this special election is only necessary because the legislature engaged in unconstitutional racial gerrymandering – and the taxpayers of North Carolina are left holding the bill,” said Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause NC. “We urge lawmakers to move beyond gerrymandering and instead adopt an independent redistricting process that would spare our state from the expensive lawsuits and delayed elections that plague partisan map-drawing.”

As Phillips pointed out, the $9.5 million cost of the special election brought about by the legislature’s gerrymandering could otherwise be used for such worthwhile projects as hiring some 270 new teachers, 280 state troopers or 300 park rangers. Alternatively, the $9.5 million could pay for more than 300,000 new textbooks for North Carolina students.

Mitch Kokai, senior political analyst for the nonpartisan John Locke Foundation, said that both parties have been guilty of gerrymandering when they’ve held the reins of power in the legislature, resulting in a cycle of costly court battles.

“The last time Democrats drew partisan election maps for North Carolina in 2001, legal challenges took up time and generated expenses for state taxpayers for most of the next decade – culminating in a U.S. Supreme Court decision that forced lawmakers to redraw election lines as late as 2009,” Kokai said. “Now, half a decade after Republicans had their first chance to draw partisan election maps in 2011, legal challenges are taking up time and generating expenses for state taxpayers again. It’s a pattern that’s likely to be repeated – decade after decade – as long as the process of drawing election maps remains in the hands of legislators seeking partisan advantage.”

Jane Pinsky, director of the nonpartisan NC Coalition for Lobbying and Government Reform, said that support for independent redistricting is growing among North Carolina voters and political leaders that are fed up with partisan gerrymandering.

She noted that House Bill 92, introduced last year with a bipartisan majority of NC House members as co-sponsors, would take redistricting power out of the hands of lawmakers and give it to nonpartisan legislative staff.  That measure is modeled after a redistricting system used successfully by Iowa for over 30 years.

“For three decades, Iowa has used its impartial redistricting process without controversy or litigation. Meanwhile, North Carolina has had to endure dozens of costly lawsuits and several delayed elections because of gerrymandering,” Pinsky said. “Partisan gerrymandering is a bad habit that North Carolina needs to break. The voters of our state deserve a redistricting process that is free from political manipulation.”

A majority of North Carolina voters support moving to an independent redistricting process, according to a February survey by Public Policy Polling. And in the past year, over 240 locally elected officials from 128 town and cities across the state have signed a petition urging the legislature to enact redistricting reform. Both Republican Gov. Pat McCrory and Democratic Attorney General Roy Cooper have spoken out against gerrymandering, as have former governors Jim Hunt and Jim Martin.

Read More

Posted by on Apr 22, 2016

Former judges kick off independent redistricting project at Duke

Duke University on Thursday was host to an effort showing how North Carolina can move beyond gerrymandering and instead adopt an independent process for drawing the state’s voting maps.

“This is something that needs to be improved and we could sit back and complain about it, but instead we said ‘let’s try,'” said Henry Frye, former chief justice of the NC Supreme Court and a participant in the redistricting project.

Organized by Duke’s Sanford School of Public Policy and Common Cause North Carolina, the independent redistricting simulation featured a bipartisan panel of 10 former judges and justices brought together to draw new, but unofficial, congressional districts as an example of fair and impartial redistricting.

“We’re hoping that this project will help better understand the issue, better understand its complexity and some potential solutions that we think might be available,” said Tom Ross, the Terry Sanford Distinguished Fellow at Duke University.

Thursday’s event was an orientation, with the panel of former judges and members of the public getting a primer on how gerrymandering has impacted North Carolina, as well as how demographics are rapidly changing the state’s population – which could be a compelling reason for Republicans and Democrats alike to take up redistricting reform.

“This is an insurance policy for both parties, because if you have something that is more fair then you can possibly, if you’re in the minority party, not be gerrymandered into irrelevancy,” said Bob Phillips, executive director of Common Cause North Carolina.

Former NC Supreme Court justice Bob Orr, another redistricting panel participant, said the state’s growing population and the complexity of the issues it faces “compels both political parties to look for ways to have a better system of government.”

Several Duke students in attendance at Thursday’s event said gerrymandering is an issue that impacts voters of all ages.

“The concept of gerrymandering is undemocratic. I think that politicians getting to choose their own voters, as opposed to the other way around, is the wrong way to do it,” said Hunter Buckworth, a student at Duke. “I think the Sanford School taking an initiative to see if we can make it better is definitely a worthwhile project.”

The panel of former judges will reconvene later this spring or summer to begin drawing congressional districts as a model of independent redistricting for North Carolina.

Polls have consistently shown bipartisan support for independent redistricting among a strong majority of North Carolina voters. At the same time, over 240 local elected officials from 128 towns and cities across North Carolina have signed a petition calling on the legislature to enact independent redistricting. And both Republican Gov. Pat McCrory and Democratic Attorney General Roy Cooper have spoken out against gerrymandering, as have former governors Jim Martin and Jim Hunt.

Read More

Posted by on Apr 19, 2016

Analysis: Changing demographics could make gerrymandering a political risk in NC

North Carolina’s unprecedented population growth will have a significant impact on the state’s upcoming political redistricting and could make gerrymandering a big gamble for both parties. That was the message presented at a press briefing Tuesday in the NC legislature.

“2020 is a question mark and the question the two parties need to ask themselves is can they bet their parties’ futures on the outcome of the 2020 election?” said Jane Pinsky, director of the nonpartisan NC Coalition for Lobbying and Government Reform.
According to Dr. Rebecca Tippett, director of Carolina Demography at the Carolina Population Center at UNC-Chapel Hill, North Carolina’s growth has outpaced the national growth rate for decades. Based on her analysis, if current state and national trends continue, North Carolina will pick up a 14th seat in the U.S. House of Representatives during the post-2020 reapportionment process.

But Tippett said North Carolina’s growth has been highly uneven around the state.

“For example, seven North Carolina counties were among the 100 fastest-growing in the nation between 2010 and 2015. At the same time, 48 of the state’s 100 counties lost population,” Tippett said. “Whether North Carolina has 13 or 14 congressional seats after 2020, all congressional districts and state legislative districts will require significant boundary changes due to these internal population shifts.”

Dr. Mark Nance, a political scientist at NC State University, said rapid demographic changes may cause widespread uncertainty for the state’s political climate and could make partisan gerrymandering a risky move for whichever party controls the legislature in the coming decade.

“For our elected officials, these dramatic population shifts mean that their districts may well look very different in five or 10 years than they do now. This spells trouble for politicians who see gerrymandering as their primary electoral strategy,” Nance said. “Mix that with the win-small, lose-big strategy of gerrymandering, and the ironic result is that the majority party will feel the brunt of these shifts first, as once-safe districts become competitive again. For that reason, it’s arguably in all of their interests to put in place an insurance policy for redistricting that honors the principle of one person, one vote.”

Pinsky pointed to House Bill 92, cosponsored by a bipartisan majority of NC House members last year, which would take redistricting authority out of the hands of partisan lawmakers and give it to nonpartisan legislative staff. That bill has not yet received a vote in the legislature.

“When HB92 was introduced in 2015, Republican House Speaker Pro Tem Paul Stam warned his colleagues on both sides of the aisle that gambling on the 2020 election was not a risk they should take,” Pinsky said.

Over 240 local elected officials from 128 towns and cities across the state have signed a petition calling for the legislature to enact independent redistricting. Gov. Pat McCrory and Attorney General Roy Cooper have both called for an end to gerrymandering, as have former governors Jim Martin, a Republican, and Jim Hunt, a Democrat.

The NC Coalition for Lobbying and Government Reform is a nonpartisan partnership of over 25 organizations working to promote good-government policies that level the playing field for the citizens of North Carolina.

More information on the effort to enact independent redistricting in North Carolina can be found at EndGerrymanderingNow.org.

Read More

Posted by on Apr 15, 2016

At gerrymandering trial in Greensboro, coalition calls for reform

On a day when state lawmakers took the stand inside a federal courtroom to defend gerrymandered voting maps, members of the nonpartisan NC Coalition for Lobbying and Government Reform gathered outside that courthouse in Greensboro to make the case for independent redistricting reform.

Jane Pinsky, director of the coalition, noted that this week’s federal trial is just the latest in a series of court cases swirling around North Carolina’s voting maps, with more than 30 judicial interventions occurring over the past three decades because of partisan gerrymandering.

“North Carolina has been through more than its share of lawsuits, postponed elections, special sessions of the NC General Assembly, and ongoing confusion,” Pinsky said. “We need a new, impartial process that puts voters in charge of redistricting and now is the time to do that.”

The coalition is urging the General Assembly to adopt a nonpartisan process in time for the next round of redistricting in 2021. A bipartisan majority of NC House members have co-sponsored a proposal – House Bill 92 – that would take redistricting authority away from partisan lawmakers and give it to nonpartisan legislative staff.

“That bipartisan bill could be taken up during the upcoming legislative session, but only if citizens across this state contact their representatives and demand action,” Pinsky said.

Mitch Kokai, senior political analyst for the John Locke Foundation, said that independent redistricting would protect the right of voters to have a say in who represents them.

“Regardless of the outcome of the current legal disputes, North Carolina needs a new process for drawing its election maps,” Kokai said. “Representative government is based on the key principle that voters must retain ultimate sovereignty. In other words, voters must choose their elected leaders, not the other way around.”

Rev. Earl Johnson, a board member with Common Cause NC, said that partisan gerrymandering undermines the ability of North Carolinians to fully exercise their right to vote.

“Partisan politics shouldn’t be part of the redistricting process, because it creates gerrymandered districts that are non-competitive and marginalizes the voice of all voters, especially African-Americans,” Johnson said. “We need a redistricting system that instills confidence among all citizens that our representative democracy is fair and truly reflective of North Carolina.”

This week’s trial considering challenges to the state’s legislative districts comes just two months after another panel of federal judges ruled that two of North Carolina’s 13 congressional districts had been racially gerrymandered and ordered them to be redrawn. That decision necessitated delaying the state’s congressional primary until the summer.

Polls have consistently shown bipartisan support for independent redistricting among a strong majority of North Carolina voters. At the same time, over 240 local elected officials from 128 towns and cities across North Carolina have signed a petition calling on the legislature to enact independent redistricting. And both Republican Gov. Pat McCrory and Democratic Attorney General Roy Cooper have spoken out against gerrymandering, as have former governors Jim Martin and Jim Hunt.

The NC Coalition for Lobbying and Government Reform is a nonpartisan partnership of over 25 organizations working to promote good-government policies that level the playing field for the citizens of North Carolina.

Read More